Tuesday, February 2, 2016

King Lear (1974) DVD Review

This is a taped live performance of a New York Shakespeare Festival production of King Lear from 1974, with James Earl Jones in the title role. The entire cast is pretty remarkable, and includes Paul Sorvino as Gloucester, Raul Julia as Edmund, and Rene Auberjonois as Edgar. Hal Holbrook introduces the program, and there is a bit of backstage footage before the play. Joseph Papp then introduces the play. At times, you can see one or another of the cameras, as this was a taped live performance rather than a performance put on specifically for television. Also because of that, there are moments – and just a few – when you wish a camera had covered a different character for a line. That being said, this is an incredible production by a talented cast.

Act I

Gloucester and Kent (Douglass Watson) enter together, with Edmund standing apart from them until Gloucester motions him forward. King Lear enters with sword in hand. He leans on the sword as he delivers his first big speech. The map is spread out on the floor. Lear seems very serious even before Cordelia says “Nothing.” This production follows the Folio version in having Kent say “Reserve thy state” rather than the Quarto’s “Reverse thy doom.” On “O vassal,” Lear raises his sword as if to attack Kent, but is held back. As Lear and his retinue exit, one man comes over to embrace Cordelia, that being the Fool. (The Fool in this production is older, with white in his beard, but not as old as Lear.)

This production uses the eighteenth century emendation “top th’” in place of “taw th’” or the Folio’s “to’th” or the Quarto’s “tooth,” and in the same line Edmund hits on every syllable of “legitimate,” getting a laugh from the audience. Paul Sorvino is excellent as Gloucester when he turns to Edgar after reading the letter and asks, “Conspiracy?” Gloucester takes out his sword just before “I’ll apprehend him.” Edgar then takes the sword from him and re-sheathes it on “if you violently proceed against him.” Raul Julia does a great job with the “This is the excellent foppery of the world” speech, though I have mixed feelings about his gesture after “lecherous.” And rather than “Fut,” he makes a sort of fart noise to accompany the gesture.

Kent’s disguise is mainly the shaving off of his beard. By the way, Douglass Watson does an excellent job in the role. There is a great moment between Lear and the Fool (Tom Aldredge) after the Fool asks, “Can you make no use of nothing, nuncle?” Lear gives him a look that lets us know he knows precisely what the Fool is referring to, and pauses as if controlling himself so as not to respond in anger. James Earl Jones is fantastic here. The Fool does cut an egg in two, and puts one half of the shell on Lear’s head as a crown. Lear simply looks at the Fool, who takes it off again. I love Goneril’s looks toward the Fool.

Act II

When Edmund tells Edgar to draw, Edgar is too distracted and Edmund himself draws Edgar’s sword and hits that sword against his own to create the sounds of a fight. There are some nice moments between Regan (Ellen Holly) and Edmund, showing Regan’s interest in him.

The exchanges between Kent and Oswald (Frederick Coffin) are totally enjoyable. After Kent is put in the stocks, a man rushes in, hands him the letter, then rushes out.

Edgar says he will grime his face and so on, but he’s already done so to a certain extent. He enters the scene shirtless, shoeless and filthy. So it seems odd for him to describe the disguise he will adopt when he’s already adopted it, or at least part of it. He does take off his pants as he speaks, however.

James Earl Jones is excellent in the scene where he begins to lose it, upset that Kent is in the stocks, upset that Regan and Cornwall do not attend him immediately. And then he displays a heartbreaking vulnerability when speaking to Regan. And I love his delivery of “I prithee, daughter, do not make me mad.”

Act III

The first scene, with Kent and Gentleman, is cut.

The storm is done by a constant rumbling and also by some lighting cues, but mainly shown by the performances of Lear and the Fool.

On his line “But where the greater malady is fixed,” Lear touches his head with both hands. When we see Edgar at Tom, his disguise has reached a more extreme state than when we last saw him, with straw in his hair and eyes drawn on his forehead. Rene Auberjonois is wonderful as Edgar, completely immersing himself in his Poor Tom role. Lear imitates, adopts some of Edgar’s gestures, as if learning from him, which is excellent.

After the Fool says he’ll go to bed at noon, he lies down with Lear and Poor Tom. When Gloucester enters, Edgar gets up and scurries off.

Gloucester’s blinding is perfectly savage and cruel. The servants’ lines at the end of the scene are cut.

Act IV

When Edgar enters, he has returned to his earlier state, still dirty and near-naked, but without the straw and the eyes drawn on his forehead. When Gloucester says “O dear son Edgar,” Edgar takes a half-step toward him, a nice moment.

Albany (Robert Stattel) is wonderful in the second scene. I especially like his quiet delivery of “What have you done?”

The lines about the Marshal of France are cut, as are the last few lines of the third scene. This one ends with Kent’s “Will in concealment wrap me up awhile.”

Regan’s final lines from the fifth scene are cut.

Gloucester pauses before going over the cliff, and then he drops rather than jumps. So you can read it as allowing himself to fall to his death or as fainting. The reunion of Lear and Gloucester is touching, and there is humor in the scene as well. Men enter slowly and surround Lear. He then leads them in a chase upstage.

Lear is carried in on a bed by four men. He begins to sit up after “I will not swear these are my hands.” The following lines, “Let’s see./I feel this pinprick,” are cut. When Cordelia tells Lear he must not kneel, she and Kent help him to his feet. And, of course, when Lear recognizes his daughter, it is a powerful moment. The lines about Edgar are cut from the end of the scene.

Act V

Edmund says, “Know of Albany if his last purpose hold” rather than “Know of the duke if his last purpose hold.” When Edmund delivers his speech about Goneril and Regan, an ominous war drum is heard.

The drums continue through the second scene, where we focus on the blind Gloucester while the battle occurs off stage.

When Edmund commands his men to take Lear and Cordelia away, Lear picks up the ropes that bind them as if to hold for a moment to speak with Cordelia. Then, when he is ready to go, he gives the ropes a gentle shake, as if to motion his own horse forward – a superb moment, showing Lear back in charge of his life even as others take him to prison. Goneril’s “If not, I’ll ne’er trust medicine” gets a laugh from the crowd. Rather than throw down a glove, Edmund spits at Albany’s feet before saying “There’s my exchange.” Edgar enters masked. Then before the fight he removes the mask and both he and Edmund are blindfolded, which is odd. They fight blindfolded. Some lines are cut, and we go from Edmund’s “And shall perchance do good” right to the Gentleman’s “Help, help!” Goneril and Regan’s bodies are not called for, nor brought on stage. Lear’s “Howl, howl” is spoken rather softly, not shouted. Oddly, the line announcing Edmund’s death is cut. Lear points to the back of his shirt when asking to have the button undone, and Kent steps forward to undo it. Lear is standing at this point, and when he says “Look on her,” he is facing upward and points to the sky, an interesting choice. So then when Edgar says, “Look up, my lord,” it is as if he is seeing Lear’s ghost where Lear had just seen Cordelia’s, and so perhaps the two are joined. Edgar speaks the last lines of the play, as in the Folio.

The DVD contains filmographies and theatre credits for several cast members.

Sunday, January 3, 2016

Shakespeare References in Remarkable Changes

Seriously, nearly book I read seems to have at least one reference to Shakespeare. I just finished reading Remarkable Changes: Turning Life's Challenges Into Opportunities by Jane Seymour, with Pamela Patrick Novotny. And Jane Seymour mentions Shakespeare twice. The first time she is talking about how her role in Live And Let Die led to a lot of offers, but all basically the same type of role. She writes: "They all led to the same kind of movie, which involved a very glamorous woman running three paces behind a man with a gun - not what I wanted to do. I wanted to do the classics, Ibsen and Shakespeare" (p. 26). The second time she is talking about her friend Sherry Jason. She writes: "Sherry, her husband, and their instructors now work with children from five to eighteen years old, giving classes in writing, acting, stage arts, jazz, ballet, Shakespeare, and photographic and visual arts" (p. 165).

Remarkable Changes: Turning Life's Challenges Into Opportunities was published 2003, and contains a preface by Christopher Reeve.

Sunday, December 27, 2015

Shakespeare Reference in The Soloist

It seems that everything I've been reading this year - with the exceptions of the old Dungeons And Dragons novels I returned to for fun - has included some reference to Shakespeare. I just finished reading Mark Salzman's novel The Soloist, and it contains one Shakespeare reference. Salzman writes, "Casals often said that he felt that Bach was the Shakespeare and Rembrandt of music rolled into one, and that Bach's music expressed every nuance of the human experience" (p. 60).

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Shakespeare References in The Cavalier Case

Shakespeare references continue to pop up in nearly everything I read. Antonia Fraser’s mystery novel The Cavalier Case contains several Shakespeare references. The first is a Hamlet reference: “However, given that the ghost of Decimus was due to pop up at the siege of Lackland Court, perhaps it was just as well Olivia, unlike Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude, had no new husband at her side” (p. 99). There are a few more Hamlet references in this novel. Fraser writes, “to the extent that Jemima thought she definitely protested too much” (p. 105) a reference to Gertrude’s line, “The lady doth protest too much, methinks.” And there is a reference to the famous bit about Yorick: “Lady Manfred’s distress – it later turned out that the skull had been the first object she disinterred – was the more understandable. ‘Alas poor Yorick,’ went on the authoritative voice, ‘ and all that. I nearly spouted the whole speech, I can tell you’” (p. 165). And it’s possible that Fraser is referring to the play when she writes, “Even if he had been ‘horrified’ – the word heard by Jemima behind her own kind of plastic arras on the tennis court” (p. 228).

There are also references to The Tragedy Of Richard The Third. Fraser writes: “It might be a rather strange method of wooing – the image of Richard III seducing Lady Anne over her husband’s bier came to her – ‘was ever woman in this humor woo’d?’ – since she had seen the play at the Barbican the night before with Cass, with its merry opening references to Mistress Shore’s ‘cherry lip, bonny eye and passing pleasing tongue.’ But who was to say it was an effective one? ‘Was ever woman in this humor won?’ the crookback future king, as played by Anton Lesser, had concluded” (p. 118). And then a little later Fraser writes: “Had she herself not been a perfectly willing party to it all – seduction of the fittest, as you might say? (Richard III came to mind again: ‘Was ever woman in this humor won’)” (p. 126).

But the play most often referred to in this novel is The Tragedy Of Macbeth. Fraser writes: “Otherwise he praised the house lavishly – ‘What a perfectly delightful situation you’ve got here’ and ‘Good to get all this fresh country air after Westminster’ – in terms which irresistibly reminded her of Duncan arriving chez the Macbeths: ‘This castle hath a pleasant seat.’ Duncan too had praised the good fresh (Scottish) air: Jemima trusted the Home Secretary’s fate at Lady Manfred’s hands would be kinder” (p. 161). Fraser then writes: “It was not even evoked by the prospect of her mission: for Jemima, having taken the decision to carry it out, did not allow herself at this point to think about what would happen if she failed (any more than she intended to digest at this point Alix’s astonishing revelation – was she implying that Dan would marry her? Ah well, as Macbeth said, there would be a time for such a word…)” (p. 220). Most of the Macbeth references are at the end of the novel. Fraser writes: “Said she did it all for him, to save his family heritage. A sort of Lady Macbeth who didn’t even let Macbeth know what was going on” (p. 226). And then: “Alix, the loyal if occasionally neglected mistress, was certainly no Lady Macbeth” (p. 227). And: “So perhaps after all Lady Macbeth was not the right analogy” (p. 229). And finally: “And Zena in the same bleak voice quoted Macbeth: ‘We are so deep in blood imbued –’ She added: ‘I believe that happens to people. They don’t know when to stop’” (p. 235).

There is also a reference to Shakespeare: “The transsexual thing is so important in the seventeenth century – how on earth can we understand Shakespeare by just going on about rent boys” (p. 204).

The Cavalier Case was published in 1991.

Monday, November 23, 2015

Shakespeare Reference on Beer Packaging

Recently I was at the beverage store, picking up a specific drink for a party, when a nearby four-pack of beer caught my eye.  It was that famous picture of William Shakespeare that got my attention, and then once I saw it I couldn't very well leave the store without purchasing that beer, Samuel Smith's Winter Ale. I'm not one to believe in signs or anything, but it did cross my mind that perhaps the picture of the world's best writer was a signal that this was the world's best beer. Ordinarily I would not even consider spending $12.99 for four bottles of beer, but my love for Shakespeare and my curiosity overrode my need to save money.

It is, it turns out, a damn good beer. But it's the packaging I want to focus on here. In addition to the picture of Shakespeare, it bears a quotation from The Two Gentlemen Of Verona: "Blessing of your heart you brew good ale." This is from Act III Scene i, and the full line is:"And thereof comes the proverb, 'Blessing of your heart, you brew good ale.'"

Monday, October 19, 2015

Shakespeare Reference in The Uncle From Rome

It seems that nearly everything I read these days contains at least one Shakespeare reference. I just finished reading a novel titled The Uncle From Rome, written by Joseph Caldwell, and approximately sixty pages from the end found this reference to Shakespeare: "They seemed more stunned than nervous, and looking at them now, Michael wondered if some exhortation might help, some show of encouragement, of confidence. The speech Shakespeare wrote Henry V at the battle of Agincourt suggested itself, but Michael felt instinctively that they were all best left alone" (p. 229).

Monday, September 28, 2015

Shakespeare Reference in Lust For Life

Irving Stone’s biographical novel about Vincent Van Gogh, Lust For Life, contains a Shakespeare reference. Stone writes, “Theo sent him a one-volume edition of Shakespeare; he read ‘Richard II,’ ‘Henry IV,’ and ‘Henry V,’ projecting his mind to other days and other places” (p. 446).

Lust For Life was originally published in 1934. The edition I read was published in 1984.